|
Central
European University A Program
for University Teachers, Advanced Ph.D. Students, Researchers and Professionals
in the Social Sciences and Humanities Summer University |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download Course Schedule and Syllabus here
Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Local Financial Management (in co-operation with the Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative of the Open Society Institute, Budapest and the World Bank Institute, Washington) June 29 - July 5, 2003
Course directors: (Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative of the Open Society Institute, Budapest) Jozsef Hegedus (Metropolitan Research Institute, Budapest) Resource persons:
Jozsef Hegedus is Head of the Metropolitan Research Institute. He was trained as an economist and holds a Ph.D. in sociology. He has ten years experience in Hungarian local government reforms, especially financial issues such as grant allocation, budgeting process, designing equalization grants, analyzing effects of local tax, local government capital budgeting, etc. As a project manager he has been lately involved in research on local government finance in Budapest, and in the preparation of the Budapest Program for 1996-2000. He led a team at MRI in co-operation with the Urban Institute, Washington to develop a training course for local government financial experts on program budgeting and related financial issues, and took part in the SNDP (Sub-National Development Program of World Bank, USAID and Know How Fund in Hungary). He was co-author of the study "Local Management in Hungary: Fiscal and Structural Adjustment at the Local Level in the Context of Economic Transition." Adrian Ionescu is the Program Director for the Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative (LGI) at the Open Society Institute in Budapest, Hungary. In addition to managing LGI, he is responsible for the "Subnational Governmental Finance, Fiscal Decentralization and Budgeting" program to generate and disseminate knowledge and best practices in CEE and fSU. Before joining the program in Budapest, Adrian worked as Project Manager for the Soros Foundation, and previously as a Research Officer for the Ministry of Public Works and Regional Planning in Romania. He holds a certificate from Harvard University, a MBA from Universite du Quebec a Montreal and a M.Sc. in Engineering from the Polytechnic University of Bucharest. Course objectives The objectives of the course are to (i) provide participants with the analytical framework for understanding intergovernmental fiscal economics and various modules of the central-subnational (e.g., local) relationship, (ii) enhance participants’ capacity for successful implementation of public sector resource management reform by analyzing mechanisms for the transfer of resources among governments and identifying ways to address the issue of regional disparities and local resource mobilization, (iii) and increase participants' understanding in the issues of fast restructuring public economy in countries of transition, (iv) enhance participants’ capacity to understand and use the practical simulation methods on public finance issues (transfers, local taxes). Course level, target audience The course has been designed for the practitioners, researchers/academics and trainers in the area of public finance related to local government issues and intergovernmental fiscal relations. Applicants are expected to have a basic knowledge of computer and software usage, e.g. Ms Excel. During the course one day will be dedicated to simple simulations using Ms Excel. Syllabus: Distance Learning Phase: I. Fiscal decentralization Overview of the fiscal decentralization problem. Key questions in decentralization. Another distinction: unitary versus federal states. Fiscal and other forms of decentralization. Critical question of decentralization. Musgrave’s definition of state functions. Traditional approach of decentralization. Why or why not decentralize. Benefits and risks of decentralization. Does decentralization destabilize? A new approach of decentralization in a transitional economy. II. European Charter of Local Self-Government Application of the decentralization theorem of Oates. Goals and structure of ECLSG. The subsidiary principle. Autonomy in expenditure decisions. Legal independence and protection. Financial autonomy according to ECLSG. Minimal requirements. Draft European Charter of Regional Self-Government. III. The assignment of expenditure responsibilities Fiscal roles and responsibilities and the operations of a multi-tier government. Finance follows function, an axiom. The assignment of expenditures--the theory and practice. First division: Public versus private goods. Second division: principles to guide expenditure assignment. Externalities of local expenditures: the spill-over effects. The capacity of local governments. Economies of scale problem. Invention at local level. Operating vs. capital spending. An appropriate regulatory framework of local expenditures. The role of privatization of public services .IV. The tax assignment problem: conceptual and administrative considerations in achieving subnational fiscal autonomy Narrowing the scope of inquiry: Musgrave's three-functions framework. Realizing the political benefits of tax assignment. Constraints on tax assignment. Conceptual arguments. Alternative methods of revenue assignment. Administrative considerations. Vertical imbalance and horizontal disparities. Concluding remarks: tax competition revisited. V. User fees at local level Concept of user fee finance. Application of benefit principle at local level. The nature of local public goods. Residual or essential revenue. ‘Price’ or ‘charge’. User charges in theory and in practice. A Public Finance vs. Public Choice. Determination techniques of user charges. Charging in relation to costs, marginal cost pricing. Charging in relation to benefits. Charges and collective provision of Services. Charging the poor. User fees in CEE countries. VI. The intergovernmental systems and grant structure Questions of macroeconomic control by central government. The objectives of an intergovernmental grant system. Correcting or adjusting for vertical imbalance. The determination of transfer pool. Internalize spillovers. Correcting inequalities among local governments: horizontal equity. Coordinating central and subnational spending. Central goals and local incentives (tax effort, inter-governmental cooperation, structure of government). Workshop Phase during SUN in Budapest VII. Framework for enhancing local government creditworthiness, municipal credit markets Framework for international local creditworthiness. General features, and issues underlying the development of municipal credit markets. "Structured" financing in municipal credit markets. Legal and regulatory framework. Local government institutional capacity. Infrastructure financing and access to private capital markets. Municipal bond markets prospects for developing countries. VIII. Property Tax, an appropriate option for local tax Increased importance of the property tax in the OECD countries. Advantages of a property tax. The property tax as a local tax. Basing the property tax on market values. Taxing both land and buildings or taxing land alone. Administration of the property tax. Exercise: designing property tax (simulation). Implementation: metering, collection, enforcement, billing. Case study. IX. Local Government Budgets and Financial Management Budget purpose. Types of budgets. Budgeting and accounting. Stages of the budget process. Capital budgeting. Evaluation of performance. Adjustment techniques in changing environment. Off-budget services. Privatization of local public services. Regulation of local market. Distance Learning The course organizers will send out distance learning materials at the beginning of April and will involve participants in a pre-course distance learning project. These materials will cover an overview of issues of financial decentralization as well as those of revenue and expenditure assignments. Course tutors will keep contact with participants sending out and discussing assignments via email. They will also establish email discussion forums among prospective participants so that they can exchange information and views prior to course start. N.B. More details (detailed C.V’s, updated course description, syllabus, reading list, etc.) will be found later at the CEU SUN web-site Assignments and assessment: Each participant is expected to prepare a presentation on the fiscal decentralization issues of her/his country and on the issues of one public sector. These papers will be presented during the course. Submission of five assignments related to the Distance Learning Modules are mandatory for participation in the SUN Workshop in July. The participants will be evaluated according to their attendance and contribution to class discussions and workshop exercises. Teaching methods: The course aims to achieve the right mix of exercises, lectures, and interactive learning methods. This includes the dissemination of materials prior to the course presentation (paper and/or electronically) and supplementing the content with simulations, case studies and interactive discussions. Preceding the course participants will receive a distance learning package containing six modules of the course (see syllabus). Teaching of the DL stage will be conducted via email discussion, guided reading, and a series of exercises via email. It is expected that students will continue to receive support after the course using Internet and Email.
Non-discrimination policy statement Central European University does not discriminate on the basis of – including, but not limited to – race, color, national and ethnic origin, religion, gender or sexual orientation in administering its educational policies, admissions policies, scholarship and loan programs, and athletic and other school-administered programs. |
|
|