









 | |
GLOBAL
GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN SECURITY
19 July - 6 August 1999
Course Director: Roger Coate (University
of South Carolina, USA)
Resource Persons:
Riina Kuusik
(Concordia International University, Estonia)
Vladimir Lomeiko (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris)
Craig N. Murphy (Wellesley College, USA)
Donald J. Puchala (University of South Carolina, USA)
Mihály Simai (Hungarian Academy of Sciences)
Course Description
This course is organized around one
of the late twentieth century's most challenging intellectual and practical
puzzles, a puzzle that challenges the core of the interstate legal order's
foundations in state sovereignty. Initiating and sustaining effective international
responses to threats to human security require the integrated engagement
of nonstate entities with state entities at and across all levels.
Yet the foundation of the UN system in the principle of the inviolability
of state sovereignty greatly constrains and inhibits UN agencies from engaging
civic and subnational state entities constructively. In this context
emerges an overriding challenge: how to generate and sustain effective
cooperation both horizontally across differing autonomous organizational
domains, legal jurisdictions, and sectors of society and vertically across
time as well as across different levels of social aggregation from the
micro level of individuals in their roles in groups, organizations, and
communities to the macro level of representative governance in international
forums.
The course will have six interrelated
parts. The first part will address the question "what is governance?" In
that general context, we will explore the relationship between global governance
and the creation and maintenance of democratic open societies at the local
and national levels. Participants will also seek to identify the constellation
of factors and forces that have conditioned the evolution of contemporary
global governance processes and structures. Particular attention will be
focused on the rise to predominance of liberal ideas, constitutive principles,
and normative structures that underpin contemporary global governance.
Class readings and discussions will explore the nature and implications
of the dialectic between liberalism and other competing systems of thought.
The second part of the course focuses
on the evolving meaning of security. It explores the global value dialectic
over peace and security and the transition from a narrow definition of
national security and protection from physical military aggression to the
much broader concept of human security meaning that individuals sense and
perceive themselves increasingly secure. Global governance and human security
are inextricably linked, and the notion of human security focuses international
organizational attention directly on individuals and their circumstances
and thereby constitutes a subtle challenge to state sovereignty. To make
people psychologically secure may, under some circumstances, be the antithesis
of making the governments of states and their territorial boundaries physically
secure. Human security is directly linked to the satisfaction of fundamental
human needs and sustainable human development. It emphasizes the psychological
end state of human development instead of the more mechanical process of
developing. Enhancing human security is what development is all about.
Class activities will explore this important relationship.
The third part of the course analyzes
the competing forces and tensions that underpin global governance and condition
the authoritative allocation of human needs and values. Participants
will examine the evolving dialectics between numerous forces and tensions,
such as integration and fragmentation, globalization and localization,
and universalism and relativism. Particular attention will be paid to identifying
and analyzing those forces that serve to undermine and limit the authority,
legitimacy, and competency of the national state and state-centered international
order. In addition, participants will critically analyze the nature and
content of global discourses about governance and security to identify
ideas, constitutive principles, and structures of meaning that underlie
those discourses and practices and associated practices.
In the context of this turbulent world
environment, one thing is clear: humankind resides in a multicultural world
in which even the remotest areas are permeated by the capitalist global
economy and a wide variety of transnational social institutions. If human
security and open societies are to prevail, they must do so in that context.
In this regard, special attention will be focused on global political economic
concerns. In part four, participants are challenged to reconceptualize
international relations and global governance in non-state-centered terms
and to move beyond state/nonstate conceptualizations, such as domestic/foreign,
inside/outside, or "we"/"they." Class activities will explore the concept
of civil society and will discuss the ways in which diverse agents and
forces of society can be brought more effectively into our models and theories
of international relations. Special emphasis will be placed on identifying
actual and potential partnerships between international institutions and
those diverse, often contradictory, and sometimes conflictual social forces
and entities that lie beyond state control.
Traditional approaches to multilateralism
and global governance have been predominantly hierarchical, concentrating
on great power relationships. Such a top-down approach, however, obscures
important aspects of dominant-subdominant relationships at the international
level and reifies and promotes certain ideas and constitutive principles
held by the most powerful participants. In recent years, however, an increasing
body of literature has emerged that challenges such a traditional orientation.
In part five, these new approaches to multilateralism and global governance
will be analyzed, as they relate to the intellectual puzzle being explored.
Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying implications for enhancing
the effectiveness of international institutions for promoting human security.
Finally, part six explores the nature,
plausibility, and possibility of reforms in international institutions
that would be required to bring civil society more fully and effectively
into global policy processes. It is designed specifically for young Ph.D’s
and advanced doctoral students who possess a basic knowledge about international
relations and/or multilateral affairs.
The course will be conducted in a mixed
format, including lectures, discussion groups, a research concept paper,
a syllabus construction project, an Internet exercise, two brief written
reaction review essays on the readings and discussions for selected topics
of the course, and a role playing/simulation exercise. Each participant
will be assigned one or more faculty mentors with whom to work during the
term.
|