









 | |
PUBLIC
POLICY PROCESS AND ANALYSIS
6 - 31 July, 1998
Course Director: László
Váradi (Budapest University of Economic Sciences)
Resource Persons:
Lance T. LeLoup
(Washington State University, Pullman, Washington, USA)
Martin Potucek (Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)
David H. Greenberg (University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA)
What is the educational goal?
The fact that the term ‘public policy’
and the vocabulary of policy-making had to be invented in the local languages
of the CEE region indicates the novelty of policy studies and policy analysis
in the region. The purpose of this course is to increase the learning process
by providing comprehensive multi-disciplinary policy analytic frameworks
which draw upon a variety of social science fields. The course will
provide information, knowledge, and skills relevant to topics and courses
for university programs which educate students who will work for governments,
legislative bodies, and civic or business organizations.
Why this course?
The multi-disciplinary character of
public policy making has still not been incorporated into the curriculum
of most CEE universities. Even public policy programs, in which such
courses should best fit, are rarely found in the region. The departmental
structures existing within universities still preserve the traditional
boundaries of social science disciplines and impede the emergence of the
multi-disciplinary study of public policy.
Outside the universities, political
debates are often framed in ideological and historical terms, with no informed
connection to contemporary realities. Moreover, policy discussions
and the evaluation of alternatives lack the depth of analysis found in
countries with longer traditions of democracy. By and large,
decision makers and public administrators may lack up-to-date conceptual
and analytical knowledge and the skills needed to manage effectively in
a democratic, market-oriented society. In addition, because policy
analysis is fundamental in the search for alternatives, it is a departure
from the prevailing conventional wisdom.
By having courses on public policy studies
and policy analysis on their curricula, CEE universities could contribute
significantly to improving the capacity of formulating and implementing
public policies.
What is the content of the course?
The course provides: (1) a conceptual
foundation of the rationales for and limitations of public policy; (2)
establishes an understanding of the major characteristics of policy-making;
(3) demonstrates the application of a policy-analytic framework and analytic
techniques for conducting policy analysis; (4) provides practical advice
about how to do policy analysis; and (5) describes techniques for evaluating
public policy and programs. The length of the course is four weeks.
This course will provide an understanding
of the complexity of policy problems in a framework in which analytical
concepts, procedures and tools brought from different branches of economics
and other social sciences play equal parts. It introduces procedures
and concepts not yet well established, or understood, in policy-making
structures within and outside governments in post-communist countries.
The first five days of the course cover
the topics of policy-making process; introduces fundamental concepts, approaches,
and typologies; describes the policy environment and ways in which political
institutions shape the process of policy formulation and adoption; and
explores implementation as well as bureaucratic and judicial policy-making.
Cases drawn from contemporary policy issues such as budget, economic, health
and social welfare, defense and foreign policies provide actual policy-making
examples which demonstrate how institutions and processes can affect outcomes.
On the sixth and seventh days, empirical
policy research cases drawn from the Czech Republic are discussed with
a background of identifying the function, place, and organization of policy
research, and also their methodology. The applicability of single
methods and an illistration of a complex research methodology into the
policy formation and implementation is discussed.
From the eighth to the thirteenth days,
another policy-analytic framework is introduced and its components are
explained in detail. This framework has the rationale of improving public
policies by searching for socially desirable outcomes. It does so by introducing
students to the concept of market failures and the other limitations of
the competitive market in contrast to the concept of government failures.
The concept and the operational effects of generic policies (tools for
governmental intervention) will then be explained. This concept demonstrates
how almost every policy involves trade-offs - that is, it may correct certain
failures in the public arena, but they may suffer from inherent limitations
and, hence create new problems. The craft of policy analysis is demonstrated
by showing how the analyst can systematically compare concrete alternatives
in terms of their impacts relative to a comprehensive set of goals (values).
Between the fourteenth and nineteenth
days, the course extends the policy-analytic framework by describing how
benefit-cost analysis can be used to evaluate public sector programs and
policies. After introducing the basic theory and concepts that underlie
benefit-cost analysis, methods are described that are used to empirically
perform benefit-cost analysis. The methods will be illustrated with case
studies of previously conducted benefit-cost evaluation.
On the twentieth day, the course concludes
by discussing the tools for prediction and influence of the adoption and
the implementation of public policies.
Who will benefit from this course?
The course is primarily targeted at
young faculty members of CEE universities who have already acquired the
concepts and methodology of at least one of the disciplinary social sciences,
such as economics, political science, sociology, law, etc. The candidate
should also believe that if their students are to have a fuller understanding
of policy-making, be better advisors to policy makers on public policy,
engage in more informed debates, and improve their ability to predict policy
outcomes, they need to apply a comprehensive policy analytic framework
with strategic thinking.
|